During our discussion of Husserl's critique of naturalism, I mentioned a recent debate about naturalism in the New York Times:
Timothy Williamson, "What is Naturalism?"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/what-is-naturalism/
Alex Rosenberg, "Why I am a Naturalist"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/why-i-am-a-naturalist/
William Egginton, "'Quixote', Colbert and the Reality of Fiction"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/25/quixote-colbert-and-the-reality-of-fiction/
Timothy Williamson, "On Ducking Challenges to Naturalism"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/on-ducking-challenges-to-naturalism/
Alex Rosenberg and William Egginton, "Bodies in Motion: An Exchange"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/bodies-in-motion-an-exchange/
Timothy Williamson, "What is Naturalism?"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/what-is-naturalism/
Alex Rosenberg, "Why I am a Naturalist"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/17/why-i-am-a-naturalist/
William Egginton, "'Quixote', Colbert and the Reality of Fiction"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/25/quixote-colbert-and-the-reality-of-fiction/
Timothy Williamson, "On Ducking Challenges to Naturalism"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/28/on-ducking-challenges-to-naturalism/
Alex Rosenberg and William Egginton, "Bodies in Motion: An Exchange"
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/bodies-in-motion-an-exchange/